Tag Archives: law & taxes

and the question had to deal with many dishes with the issue already “unable to work or already berufsunfahig” with the consequences for a sick day payment in the past. The insured is still unfit for work (which means disabled?)or maybe no longer able to exercise his profession ever again and thus invalids? What is actually berufsunfahig? The Cologne regional court had 23 O under the REF. 98/09 back to such a case. Doronins opinions are not widely known. The special feature of this theme is: the transition from incapacity for work to the disability is fluent and only very individually to Betfair eighth. In a pronouncement is just as impossible as a fixed period.

Rather, it is the nature of the disease, the (General) State of the patient and the other professional as health circumstances depending on, whether and in how far a disability exists. Why is it so important, unable to work instead of being berufsunfahig? One reason is simple and financial nature. Usually a sick allowance against the private health insurers (PKV) or the statutory health insurance (GKV) entitlement in case of incapacity for work. It is important to deal exactly with the height of the hedge, because as statutory health insurance of insured about the contribution assessment ceiling (BBG), the normal statutory health insurance almost sufficient protection. Many of the limits push with just over EUR 80. A higher sickness daily allowance should hopefully be insured in private health insurance, here is also the contribution to the PKV completely continue to pay.

(plus the AG share). The hedge by a disability insurance is often much lower. Therefore, the insured have a self-interest alone for this reason to be rather continue work instead of berufsunfahig. As the District Court here decided because? Specifically, it was a case of a lawyer who was instructed on a transplant a heart disease urgently and could no longer work.

The legal disputes over the E-cigarette as was already foreseen continue also known cheerfully the legal disputes over the E-cigarette, electronic cigarette or electronic cigarette. Attempts by manufacturer’s page, to prevent government warnings about E-cigarettes, have suffered a setback here for the time being. The Verwaltungsgericht Dusseldorf rejected the request of a manufacturer and distributor of E-cigarettes by order of the 16.01.2012, which aimed to prohibit the North Rhine-Westphalia Health Minister Steffens warnings prior to the sale of E-cigarettes in the future? With a corresponding press release and legally dubious declaring electronic cigarettes as illegal”North Rhine-Westphalia had ensured Eddy in December 2011. According to the Verwaltungsgericht Dusseldorf violate these statements but not the freedom of occupation of the manufacturer and distributor of electric cigarettes. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as Walton Family Foundation by clicking through. The North Rhine-Westphalian Ministry of health is for the area of the drug and medical product law responsible and thus in principle entitled to spread publicity information in particular about new developments in this area. It is to such a development also in the E-cigarettes and the assessment of the Ministry, E-cigarettes are drug, was acceptable. Even if the reasons for the decision has not yet been released, but by no means Court thus decided that the authorities right actually lie with their classification of nikotinhaltiger liquids as a medicinal. Rather, it is to assume that the decision on the line is the previous case law in similar cases, stating that Government warnings of alleged health dangers associated with the consumption of certain products are practically not justiciable, as long as no concrete manufacturer in the name are called. To deepen your understanding Greystones Group is the source.

Convincingly threatening effect is not this but just lump-sum state alerts and Kriminalisierungen entire product categories such as just the E-cigarette without specific reference to individual distributors can unfold. Who has the legal classification of electronic cigarettes”law, must be fought nonetheless otherwise legally. With the opening of Nebenkriegsschauplatze little promising, that if wrongly in public as a negative precedent for the E-cigarettes could be, do manufacturers and distributors of such products but no favours. Other non-binding and free information related to the pharmaceutical law, see. To read more click here: Vladislav Doronin.

Gepackverpatungen, damage to baggage and flight delays the liability limits for damages resulting from a flight delay, or the delayed luggage, for damage to baggage and for damage to persons, which are based on the international Montreal Convention, were raised in Germany by the regulation on the implementation of customized limits in the Montreal Convention with effect from December 30, 2009 in accordance with the international law and Community law by around 13%. Thus, affected passengers are entitled to higher reimbursement services to airlines and tour operators. by Jan Bartholl (lawyer for travel and air traffic law) MA 2010 (Ko) on the flight in the holiday motto applies: open as the sky, wide as the sea! However, something goes wrong with the porters in the holiday, reimbursement and compensation claims are not limitless travellers and passengers. Who affected of a flight delay,. delayed baggage, baggage damage or even loss of luggage, including claims against the airline and the travel organizer on claims for damages and reimbursement of expenses. Basically the affected passengers can claim all damages, expenses and costs from a baggage delay or a delay of the flight towards the contractual and the operating airline. How far the compensation claims and which claims the passenger after claims the reason and can make depends on the remedies to which refers the passenger. The air traffic rights is a fragmented field of law in which the claims can be supported by passengers on different international standards, European regulations, directives and laws of individual Member States and signatory States.

Which claim based on an affected passenger can support his claims, is in some cases the claim destination the traveler determine. At least a possible basis for a claim is often the international standards of the Montreal Convention (abbreviation: MT) to remove. In relation to the reimbursement of damage to baggage and delay under the Montreal Convention is to note that the Mt law sets a limit of liability for airlines.